نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
2 مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی
3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
چکیده
هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر، سنجش عوامل موثر بر کنترل و پایش ریسک پروژههای تحقیقاتی ورزشی بود.
روش‌شناسی: پژوهش حاضر، از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از نوع پیمایشی مبتنی بر معادلات ساختاری بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل پژوهشگرانی است که در طرح‌های تحقیقاتی ورزشی مشارکت داشته‌اند و 65 نفر به روش نمونهگیری هدفمند و در دسترس انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری این تحقیق پرسشنامه‌های کنترل و پایش ریسک، پرسشنامه کنترل کیفیت، پرسشنامه توسعه تیم، پرسشنامه توسعه توانمندی و پرسشنامه تحلیل ریسک است که روایی صوری و محتوایی این ابزارهای پژوهش مورد تأیید اساتید و خبرگان دانشگاهی قرار گرفت. تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از شاخص‌های آمار توصیفی همچون جداول توزیع فراوانی و روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری با رویکرد حداقل مربعات جزئی انجام شده است.
یافته‌ها: تحلیل ریسک بر کنترل کیفیت با ضریب مسیر 593/0، تحلیل ریسک بر توسعه تیم با ضریب مسیر 613/0، تحلیل ریسک بر توسعه توانمندی با ضریب مسیر 623/0، کنترل و پایش ریسک بر تحلیل ریسک با ضریب مسیر 663/0 در پروژههای تحقیقاتی ورزشی تأثیرگذار است. همچنین مقدار GOF در این پژوهش، برابر با 256/0 است که نشان از برازش بالاتر از متوسط مدل پژوهش است.
نتیجه‌گیری: در نهایت با توجه به نتایج تحقیق می‌توان گفت در پروژههای تحقیقاتی نیاز به دید کلنگر و سیستمی به ریسکها میباشد. همچنین نیاز است ریسکها به تناسب زمان و هزینه اولویتبندی شوند و روش مناسب پاسخگویی به هر ریسک قبل از پروژه ارائه شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Measuring the effective factors of controlling and monitoring the risk of sports research projects
نویسندگان [English]
- habib honari 1
- mohammad hosein Ghorbani 2
- farzaneh mazloomi soveini 3
1 associate professor in Allameh Taataba'i university
2 Allameh Tabataba'i University
3 PhD in sport management - university of Allameh Tabatabaei
چکیده [English]
Objective: The purpose of this study was to measuring the effective factors of controlling and monitoring the risk of sports research projects.
Methodology: The present study was applied in terms of purpose and survey type based on structural equations. The statistical population of the study includes researchers who have participated in sports research projects and 65 people were selected by purposive and available sampling. The collection tools of this research are risk control and monitoring questionnaires, quality control questionnaire, team development questionnaire, competency development questionnaire and risk analysis questionnaire. The face and content validity of these research tools were approved by professors and academic experts. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistical indicators such as frequency distribution tables and structural equation modeling with partial least squares approach (PLS).
Results: Risk analysis on quality control with path coefficient of 0.593, risk analysis on team development with path coefficient of 0.613, risk analysis on capability development with path coefficient of 0.623, risk control and monitoring on risk analysis with path coefficient of 0.663 in Sports research projects are influential. The findings also indicate that the value of GOF in this study is equal to 0.256, which indicates that the research model has a higher than average fit.
Conclusion: Finally, according to the research results, it can be said that in research projects, there is a need for a holistic and systematic view of risks. Risks also need to be prioritized in proportion to time and cost, and an appropriate pre-project response to each risk needs to be provided.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Risk control and monitoring
- Research projects.
- Risk analysis
- Abdullahi, H. R., Baharanchi Hassani, S. R. (2013). Presenting Quality Control System Model for Defense Research Projects Projects, International Management Conference, Challenges and Solutions, Shiraz. [Persian].
- Aminbakhsh, S., Gunduz, M., Sonmez, R. (2013). Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects. Journal of Safety Research, 46, 99-105.
- Assarian Nejad, H. (2008). Book Review and Analysis: Security Risk Management and Analysis, Strategic Attitude, 91, 252- 217. [Persian].
- Avison, D., Lau, F., Neilsen, P. A., Myers, M. (1999). Action research, Communications of ACM, 42(1), 94-7.
- Azizi, N. (2013). A study of procedures to improve research performance of scientific staff members of humanities. Rahborde Farhang, 21(1), 7-34. [Persian].
- Blanchard, K., Carlos, J. P., Randolph, A. (2001). Empowerment takes more than a minute. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
- Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1189–1207.
- Busby, J. S., Green, B., Hutchison, D. (2017). Analysis of affordance, time, and adaptation in the assessment of industrial control system cybersecurity risk. Risk Analysis, 37(7), 1298-1314.
- Chin, W.W. (1998). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22 (1), 7-16.
- Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). The real success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 185-190.
- De Andrade, F. M., Coelho, C. A., Cavalcanti, I. F. (2019). Global precipitation hindcast quality assessment of the Subseasonal to Seasonal (S2S) prediction project models. Climate Dynamics, 52(9-10), 5451-5475.
- Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M. T., Han, S. (2007). Using fuzzy risk assessment to rate cost overrun risk in international construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 25(5), 494-505.
- Evans, A.B., Barker-Ruchti, N., Blackwell, J., Clay, G., Dowling, F., Frydendal, S., ... & Winther, H. (2021). Qualitative research in sports studies: challenges, possibilities and the current state of play. European Journal for Sport and Society, 18 (1), 1-17.
- Fathi Biranvand, A. (2018). Project Risk Management, Third Annual Conference on Architecture, Urban Planning and Management Research, Shiraz, Mehrazi Ambassadors Institute of Architecture and Urban Planning. [Persian].
- Frozandeh, M., Teimoury, E., Makoee, A. (2017). Developing a Conceptual Model of Supply Chain Management in Research-Development Projects. Journal of Management Improvement, 11(1), 117-162. [Persian].
- Ghodousi, P., Rabiei, Z. (2015). The Impact of Organizational Culture on the Development of Construction Project Teams, 11th International Project Management Conference, Ariana Industrial Research Group, Tehran. [Persian].
- Galli, B. J. (2017). Risk management in project environments: Reflection of the standard process. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 5(2). 40-49.
- Ghorbani, M. H., keshkar, S., Honari, H., & Shabanibahar, G. (2022). Imaging the Future of Sports Science from the Perspective of the Educated Youth. Journal of Iran Futures Studies, 7(2), 235-252. [Persian].
- Gibson, C. B., Kirkman, B. L., (1999). Our past, present, and future in teams: The role of human resource professionals in managing team performance. Evolving practices in human resource management: Responses to a changing world of work, 90-117.
- Goffin, K., Koners, U., Baxter, D., Van der Hoven, C. (2010). Managing lessons learned and tacit knowledge in new product development. Research Technology Management, 53(4), 39–51.
- Gołaś, H., Mazur, A., Mrugalska, B. (2016). Application of risk analysis and quality control methods for improvement of lead molding process. Metalurgija, 55(4), 811-814.
- Govindarajulu N, Daily, B. F. (2004). Motivating Employees for Environmental Improvement. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104(4), 364-72.
- Harris, T. (2007). Collaborative research and development projects: A practical guide. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R. R., (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-320.
- Honari, H., Ghorbani, M. H., & mehraji, M. (2022). The impact of risk control and monitoring on the success of sport project management with time management mediation. Contemporary Studies On Sport Management, 12(23), 1-18. [Persian].
- Hoyt, R. E., Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The Value of Enterprise Risk Management. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78 (4) 795– 822.
- Hulland, J., (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204.
- KarimiAzari, A., Mousavi, N., Mousavi, S. F., Hosseini, S. (2011). Risk assessment model selection in construction industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 9105-9111.
- Kirkland, J. (2008). University research management: an emerging profession in the developing world, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(6), 717–726.
- Li, Y., Liao, X. (2007). Decision support for risk analysis on dynamic alliance, Decision Support Systems, 42(4), 2043–2059.
- Mahmoodi, J., Hossein zade, A. (2011). Presenting a Model for Risk Recognition and Management in Supply Chain Projects. Logistics Thought, 10(36), 1-10. [Persian].
- Mahood, M. (2014). Investigating the Implementation of Executive Teams in Projects of Construction Contractor Companies Using Competency Templates, Mehr Alborz Institute of Higher Education, MSc Thesis. [Persian].
- Meyer, M., Roodt, G., Robbins, M. (2011). Human resources risk management: governing people risks for improved performance: opinion paper. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(1), 1-12.
- Mohammadi, Y., Khazaei, L. (2016). Investigating the Role of Structural and Management Factors in University in Increasing the Implementation of Research Research Projects in Education from the Viewpoints of Faculty Members. Journal of Development Strategies in Medical Education, 3(2), 75-83. [Persian].
- Mousavi, S. A., Abdi, F., Raisi, S (2015). Ranking of risk factors of research projects using a combination of network analysis process methods and fuzzy DEMATEL. Journal of Standard and Quality Management, 4(14), 48-57. [Persian].
- Morris, P., Pinto, J. K. (Eds.). (2010). The Wiley guide to project organization and project management competencies (Vol. 8). John Wiley & Sons.
- Ng, S. T., Tang, Z. (2010). Labour-intensive construction sub-contractors: Their critical success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7), 732-740.
- Novikov, D. A., Sukhanov, A. L. (2005). Models and mechanisms of management of scientific projects at the univerisities. Moscow, Institut upravleniia obrazovaniem RAO.
- Omani, A. (2011). Analysis of factors affecting the participation of faculty members inresearch activities and the obstacles (Case Study: College of Agriculture and Water Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Branch unit). Research, Agricultural extension and education, 4(2), 70-83. [Persian].
- Ostroukh, A. V., Krasnyanskiy, M. N., Karpushkin, S. V., Obukhov, A. D. (2014). Development of automated control system for university research projects. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 20(12), 1780-1784.
- Pak Tinat, I., Fathi Zadeh, A. (2008). Individual and Group Empowerment of Human Resources, Second Human Resources Empowerment Conference, Tehran, Iran Human Resources Empowerment Foundation. [Persian].
- Park, S. H. (2009). Whole life performance assessment: critical success factors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(11), 1146-1161.
- Perry, B. (2006). Science, society and the university: a paradox of values. Social Epistemology, 20(3–4), 201–219.
- Project Management Institute PMI (2008), A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 4th ed., Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA, 2004.
- Rahnamaye roodposhti, F. (2008). Strategic Management Accounting, based on Value Added Cost Management, First Edition, Islamic Azad University Press, Science and Research Branch. [Persian].
- Riol, H., Thuillier, D. (2015). Project management for academic research projects: balancing structure and flexibility. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 7(3), 251-269.
- Samian, H., Latifi, M. (2014). A Survey of the Librarians' Viewpoints of the Public Libraries of Mazandaran Province on the Level of Their Empowerment in the Workplace. Information Research and Public Libraries, 20 (1), 92-92. [Persian].
- Shahlaee Bagheri, J., Ghorbani, M. H., Mazloomi soveini, F. (2019) Strategic management in sports governing bodies. Hatmi Press. [Persian]
- Shapiro, S. S. (2016). Privacy risk analysis based on system control structures: Adapting system-theoretic process analysis for privacy engineering. In 2016 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW). 17-24
- Tabassi, A., Abu Bakar A. H (2009). Training, motivation, and performance: The case of human resource management in construction projects in Mashhad, Iran. International Journal of Project Management, 27(5), 471-480.
- Verma, V. (1997). The human aspects of project management-managing the project team, volume three. Project Management Institute.
- Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 177-195.
- Wysocki, R. K. (2002). Building effective project teams. Wiley.
- Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Tamošaitiene, J. (2010). Risk assessment of construction projects. Journal of civil engineering and management, 16(1), 33-46.
- Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Tamošaitiené, J., Marina, V. (2008). Multicriteria selection of project managers by applying grey criteria. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(4), 462-477.
- Zolfi Gol, M. A. (2004). Science Development to Wealth Production. Rahyaft Scientific Research Policy Quarterly, 33(14), 16-23. [Persian].
- Zwikael, O., Unger-Aviram, E. (2010). HRM in project groups: The effect of project duration on team development effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 413-421.
)