نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه علوم ورزشی،دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

4 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی، گروه تربیت بدنی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف: این پژوهش با هدف بررسی ارتباط ساختاری اشتیاق کارآفرینانه، خلاقیت فناورانه و ادراک تجاری­‌سازی پژوهش­‌های علوم ورزشی انجام شده است.
روش­‌شناسی: پژوهش حاضر، توصیفی-پیمایشی و از نظر هدف کاربردی است. جامعه آماری شامل دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی علوم ورزشی بود که در سال­‌های 1398-1397در دانشگاه­‌های شهر تهران مشغول به تحصیل بودند و بر اساس جدول مورگان، 385 نفر به عنوان نمونه به­‌صورت تصادفی انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، پرسشنامه استاندارد بود. روایی این پرسشنامه‌ها با کمک نظرات اصلاحی اساتید مدیریت ورزشی و متخصصان حوزه ورزش مورد بررسی قرار گرفت و پایایی پرسشنامه‌ها از طریق تعیین ضریب آلفای کرونباخ و پایایی مرکب تأیید شد.
یافته­‌ها: نتایج به­‌دست آمده از نرم­‌افزار SMART PLS 3 نشان داد که اشتیاق کارآفرینانه (همراه با ابعاد پنج­گانه خود) و خلاقیت فناورانه هرکدام رابطه مستقیم و معنی‌داری با ادراک تجاری­‌سازی دستاوردهای پژوهشی دانشجویان دارند. ضمن آن­که اشتیاق کارآفرینانه به عنوان عامل محرک خلاقیت فناورانه شناخته شد.
نتیجه­‌گیری: دانشجویان علوم ورزشی لازم است هم­‌راستایی متوازنی بین اهداف علمی و تجاری برقرار سازند و برای حرکت در مسیر تجاری­‌سازی، از احساسات مثبت شدید و هویت­‌بخش خویش در راستای تبدیل ایده­‌ها (دانش) به پدیده­‌های نوآورانه استفاده نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

From the Entrepreneurial Passion and Technological Creativity of Students to the Commercialization of Iranian Sport Sciences Researches

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Rahimi 1
  • Mohammad Ehsani 2
  • Marjan Saffari 3
  • Rasool Norouzi Seyed hossini 4

1 PhD Student in Sport Management, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran. Iran

2 Professor, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. Iran

4 Associate Professor, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the structural relationship between entrepreneurial passion, technological creativity and the commercialization of sports science research.
Methodology: The present study is descriptive-survey and applied in terms of purpose. The statistical population consisted of postgraduate students of sports science who were studying in Tehran universities during the years 1398-1397; based on Morgan’s Table, 385 students were selected randomly. The validity of the questionnaires was assessed by the opinions of Sport Management professors and experts, and their reliability was confirmed by Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability.   
Results: The results obtained from SMART PLS 3 showed that entrepreneurial passion (along with its five dimensions) and technological creativity each had a direct and significant relationship with the commercialization perception of students' research achievements. At the same time, entrepreneurial passion was recognized as the driving force behind technological creativity.
Conclusion: Sport science students need to establish a balance between scientific and business goals and for moving on the path to commercialization, use their strong positive emotions and Identity Makers to transform their ideas (knowledge) into innovative phenomena.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Commercialization
  • Sports Science
  • Entrepreneurial Passion
  • Technological Creativity
  • Students
Amini, M., Tamannai Far, M., & Gholamy Alavi, S. (2013). Evaluation of Entrepreneurship Capabilities of Students: Rethinking Curriculum Commissions of High Education. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 6(1), 145-164. doi: 10.2205/9jed.2013.36254 (Persian)
Andam, R., khachian, A., & Asgari, M. (2015). Effective factors on change management at physical education faculty. Quarterly Journal of Public Organzations Management, 3(2), 7-20 (Persian)
Azimi Delarestaghi, a., Razavi, s. m. h., & Boroumand, m. r. (2019). Identifying the Effective Context Conditions of Strategic Entrepreneurship Deployment in Sports Business. Sport Management and Development, 7(4), 70-87. doi: 10.22124/jsmd.2019.3253 (Persian)
Bao, J., Zhou, X., & Chen, Y. (2017). Entrepreneurial passion and behaviors: Opportunity recognition as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 45(7), 1211-1220.
Bengtsson, L. (2017). A comparison of university technology transfer offices’ commercialization strategies in the Scandinavian countries. Science and Public Policy, 44(4), 565-577.
Cardon, M. S., Glauser, M., & Murnieks, C. Y. (2017). Passion for what? Expanding the domains of entrepreneurial passion. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 8, 24-32.
Cardon, M. S., Gregoire, D. A., Stevens, C. E., & Patel, P. C. (2013). Measuring entrepreneurial passion: Conceptual foundations and scale validation. Journal of business venturing, 28(3), 373-396.
Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of management Review, 34(3), 511-532.
Dastoom, S., Ramezani Nezhad, R., benar, N., & Rasouli, R. (2013). Survey of interactions administrative departments and industry sport in Iran Based on the Analysis Documents and structural. Applied Research in Sport Management, 2(2), 91-109  (Persian)
Drnovsek, M., Cardon, M. S., & Patel, P. C. (2016). Direct and indirect effects of passion on growing technology ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10(2), 194-213.
Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(1), 64-77.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research policy, 32(2), 333-350.
Gartner, W. B. (1988). “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. American journal of small business, 12(4), 11-32.
Goudarzi, M., Jalali Farahani, M., Rajabi, H., & Hamidi, M. (2017). The Design and Codification of Development Model of Entrepreneurial Skills for Students of Sport Management in Iran. New Trends in Sport Management, 5(18), 9-21 (Persian)
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Fayolle, A., Klofsten, M., & Mian, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities: emerging models in the new social and economic landscape. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 551-563.
Hardman, A. (2012). Sport, Technology and the Body: Taylor & Francis.
Hawthorne, E. P. (1971). The transfer of technology (Vol. 29595): Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Johnson, D. (2001). What is innovation and entrepreneurship? Lessons for larger organisations. Industrial and commercial training. 33(4), 135-140.
Karamidarchamani, n., Eydi, H., & Zardoshtian, S. (2019). Presentation of Role Modeling of Sport Faculties of Iran in Relation to Community. Research on ٍEducational Sport, -. doi: 10.22089/res.2019.7856.1734 (Persian)
Keshavarz, l., Farahani, a., & Alizadehgolrizi, a. (2018). The pattern design of research commercialization in sport management. Sport Management and Development, 7(2), 1-18. doi: 10.22124/jsmd.2018.3226 (Persian)
Kim, B., Kim, H., & Jeon, Y. (2018). Critical success factors of a design startup business. Sustainability, 10(9), 2981.
Kos, A., Wei, Y., Tomažič, S., & Umek, A. (2018). The role of science and technology in sport. Procedia Computer Science, 129, 489-495.
Kruger, M. E. (2005). Creativity in the entrepreneurship domain. University of Pretoria.  Published PhD thesis in Entrepreneurship, 175-176.  
Kuhn, M., & Prettner, K. (2016). Growth and welfare effects of health care in knowledge-based economies. Journal of Health Economics, 46, 100-119.
Mondalizade, z., Ehsani, m., & Honari, h. (2016). Developing Sustainable Entrepreneurship Model in Sport Based on the Grounded Theory. Journal of Sport Management, 8(5), 709-725. (Persian)
Mondalizadeh, Z., Ehsani, M., Kozechian, H., & Honari, H. (2015). The Environmental Factor Affecting on Sport Entrepreneurship. Sport Management Studies, 7(29), 99-116.  (Persian)
Muscio, A., & Ramaciotti, L. (2019). How does academia influence Ph. D. entrepreneurship? New insights on the entrepreneurial university. Technovation. 16-24, 82.
Shane, S., & Nicolaou, N. (2015). Creative personality, opportunity recognition and the tendency to start businesses: A study of their genetic predispositions. Journal of business venturing, 30(3), 407-419.
Umam, K., Dhewanto, W., & Larso, D. (2008). Higher education institution and technology transfer. proceedings of the 5th AGSE International Entrepreneurship Research Exchange, Melbourne.
Vallerand, R. J. (2015). The psychology of passion: A dualistic model: Series in Positive Psychology.
Yeh, Y.-C., & Wu, J.-J. (2006). The cognitive processes of pupils' technological creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 213-227.
Zali, M. R., & Goodarzi, K. (2017). Identification of Characteristics related to Passion for Work of Entrepreneurial Leaders. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 10(1), 121-140. doi: 10.22059/jed.2017.62287 (Persian)
Zawawi, N. F. M., Wahab, S. A., Al-Mamun, A., Yaacob, A. S., Kumar, N., & Fazal, S. A. (2016). Defining the concept of innovation and firm innovativeness: a critical analysis from resource-based view perspective. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(6), 87-94.