نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران

2 استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب

3 دانشیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب

چکیده

هدف:  هدف از این پژوهش طراحی و تبیین چارچوب اکوسیستم کارآفرینی در صنعت ورزش کشور بود.
روش‌شناسی: روش تحقیق از نوع کیفی نظام‌مند بود. جامعه آماری شامل اساتید، مدیران، صاحبان کسب و کار، کارآفرینان و مشاوران حوزه صنعت ورزش، مخترعین، و نوآوران در خدمات و تولیدات ورزشی بود. نمونه آماری به صورت غیرتصادفی، هدفمند و دردسترس بر مبنای میزان ارتباط با موضوع و اعتبار علمی انتخاب و نظرخواهی شد. ابزار پژوهش شامل سه ابزار؛ مطالعه کتابخانه­ای، مصاحبه اکتشافی نیمه هدایت شده و تکنیک دلفی دو مرحله­ای بود. روایی هر یک از ابزارهای پژوهش براساس اعتبار نمونه مراجعه شده و ضریب توافق بین متخصصان و خبرگان مورد تأیید قرار گرفت.
یافته‌ها: پس از تحلیل داده‌های گردآوری شده از روش‌های کدگذاری و چارچوب‌بندی و تحلیل ساختاری و نظا‌م‎مند، عوامل اصلی در ایجاد اکوسیستم کارآفرینی در ورزش شناسایی گردید و در نهایت شش حیطه‌ی اصلی شامل: محیط کارآفرینانه؛ سرمایه‌های انسانی؛ رهبری کارآفرینانه؛ اماکن، لوازم و خدمات ورزشی؛ تأمین مالی؛ و زیرساخت‌های کارآفرینی بود. درنهایت با استفاده از روش دلفی دو مرحله‌ای چارچوب اکوسیستم کارآفرینی در ورزش طراحی و تبیین گردید.
نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به اینکه تعریف و تغییر ساختار یکی از پاسخ­های سازمان­ها و سیستم­ها به تغییرات محیطی است و اکوسیستم کارآفرینی ورزشی در کشور با چالش­های زیادی مواجه است بنابراین چارچوب طراحی شده در این پژوهش می­تواند در ارزیابی، تحلیل و نظام‎مندسازی اکوسیستم  کارآفرینی ورزشی مبنا قرار بگیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing and Explaining the framework of Entrepreneurship Ecosystem in Sport

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abbas Farahmandmehr 1
  • Farideh Sharififar 2
  • Reza Nikbakhsh 3

1 PhD in Sport Management of Islamic Azad University, Tehran South Branch

2 Asistant Professor of Islamic Azad University, Tehran South Branch

3 Associate Professor of Islamic Azad University, Tehran South Branch

چکیده [English]

Objective: The purpose of this research was to designing and explaining the framework of entrepreneurship ecosystem in Sport.
Methodology: The research method was systematic qualitative. The statistical population consisted of professors, managers, business owners, entrepreneurs, innovators, inventors and advisers in the field of sports industry. The statistical sample was selected and deliberately selected on a targeted and accessible basis based on the relevance of the subject and the scientific validity. The research instrument consisted of three tools: library study, semi-guided exploratory interview and two-step Delphi technique. The validity of each research tools was based on sample validity and the coefficient of agreement between Specialists and experts was approved.
Results: After analyzing the data collected from coding and framing and structural and systematic analysis, Researchers identify the main actors in the creation of an entrepreneurship ecosystem in sport, which include six main areas: entrepreneurial environment; human capital; entrepreneurial leadership; places, equipment, and sports services; financing; and, entrepreneurship infrastructure. Finally, using the two-stage Delphi method, the framework for entrepreneurship ecosystem in sport was designed and explained.
Conclusion: Given that the definition and restructuring of one of the responses of organizations and systems to environmental changes and the ecosystem of entrepreneurship in the country faces many challenges, Therefore, the framework designed in this study can be used to evaluate, analyze and systematize the basis of the basic sports entrepreneurship ecosystem.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sports industry
  • Sports entrepreneurship
  • Entrepreneurship system
  • Structural analysis
  • Ø Ahmadpour Dariani, M. (2001). Entrepreneurship; definitions of theories and patterns. Tehran: Pardis. (Persion)
  • Ø Ahmadpour Dariani, M., & Moghimi, S. M. (2009). The Basics of Entrepreneurship. Tehran: Ferendish. (Persion)
  • Ø Arabi, Z., & Kazemi, A. (2014). The Impact of the Human Development Index on Iran's Gross Domestic Product. Economic Growth and Development Research, 5(17), 109-124. (Persion)
  • Ø Arasti, Z., & Gholami, M. (2010). Causes of Failure of Entrepreneurs in Iran. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 3(4), 163-184. (Persion)
  • Ø Bahrami, H., & Evans, S. (1995). Flexible re-cycling and high-technology entrepreneurship. California Management Review, 37(3), 62-89.
  • Ø Baron, R. A. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of management Review, 33(2), 328-340.
  • Ø Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1-14.
  • Ø Coppedge, M. (2002). Theory Building and Hypothesis Testing, Large N vs. Small N Research on Democratization.
  • Ø Cotton, J. (1991). Enterprise education experience: a manual for school-based in-service training. Education+ Training, 33(4).
  • Ø Dahshan, M. E., Tolba, A. H., & Badreldin, T. (2012). Enabling entrepreneurship in Egypt: Toward a sustainable dynamic model. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(2), 83-106.
  • Ø Deakins, D., & Freel, M. (2003). Entrepreneurship and small firm. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Ø Deft, R. L. (2005). Essentials of Organization Theory and Design. (A. Parsaeian & S. M. Arabi, Trans. 11 ed.). Tehran: Office of Cultural Studies. (Persion)
  • Ø Dennis, D. (2008). SME Policy in Europe, in Sexton and Landström.  Handbook of Entrepreneurship: Blackwell Publishers
  • Ø European Commission. (2008). Entrepreneurship in Higher Education, Especially Within Non-Business Studies: Final Report of the Expert Group. Enterprise and Industry, 1-69.
  • Ø Farahmandmehr, A. (2017). Entrepreneurship ecosystem in sports with the approach of sport tourism development in villages of Iran. Paper presented at the The First National Festival of Achievements in Village Entrepreneurship, Tehran. (Persion)
  • Ø Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities; Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city (A. Kazemi, Trans.). Isfahan: Nashryar. (Persion)
  • Ø Forfas, F. (2009). Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: South West Ireland, rethinking entrepreneurship. Baseline Data and Analysis. In: South West Ireland, Dublin.
  • Ø Ghambarali, R., Agahi, H., Alibaygi, A., & Zarafshani, k. (2015). Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy: a New Paradigm for Entrepreneurship Development. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Agriculture, 1(3), 21-38. (Persion)
  • Ø Gibson, J. W., Tesone, D. V., & Buchalski, R. M. (2000). The leader as mentor. Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(3), 56-67.
  • Ø Hadavand, S. (2011). Educational capacity building, necessity or formalities. Tehran: Iran electronics industries.

 

 

  • Ø Hallam, P. R., Chou, P. N., Hite, J. M., & Hite, S. J. (2012). Two contrasting models for mentoring as they affect retention of beginning teachers. Nassp Bulletin, 96(3), 243-278.
  • Ø Hirschman, A. O. (1958). Interdependence and Industrialization in the Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Ø Isenberg, D. (2011a). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs.
  • Ø Isenberg, D. (2011b). How to foment an entrepreneurial revolution, The Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project. Paper presented at the 10th international Entrepreneurship Forum.
  • Ø Isenberg, D. (2012). Introducing the Babson entrepreneurship ecosystem project. Fostering high growth entrepreneurship ecosystems around the world (Power Point, disponible: http://www. grcc. com/App_Content/media/user_files/InterCity_Visit/2012/Presentations/LenSchlesinger_EcoSystem. pdf).
  • Ø James Cook University. (2009). Bachelor of Business (Sports & Events Management). Australia: www.jcu.edu.au/business/JCUPRD_037555.html.
  • Ø Khodadad, S. (2016). Analyze the entry trend and distribution of physical education and sports science graduated to labor market. (M.S), Shahid Beheshti University. (Persion)
  • Ø Khoshkab, S., & Rastegar, A. (2015). Educational Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Culture (Challenges and Solutions). Cultural Engineering, 3(75), 176-192. (Persion)
  • Ø Laviolette, E. M., Radu Lefebvre, M., & Brunel, O. (2012). The impact of story bound entrepreneurial role models on self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 18(6), 720-742.
  • Ø Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard business review, 71(3), 75-86.
  • Ø Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., & Corbett, A. C. (2004). An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 190-208.
  • Ø Pistrui, D., Blessing, J., & Mekemson, K. (2008). Building an entrepreneurial engineering ecosystem for future generations: The Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference.
  • Ø Pitts, B., & Stotlar, D. (2002). Fundamentals of Sport Marketing. USA: Fitness Information Technology. Inc. LEONOR GALLARDO GUERRERO.
  • Ø Ramezani Nejad, R., Miryousefi, E., & Molaei, M. (2016). Application of organizational theories in sport (Vol. Third). Tehran: Hatmi. (Persion)
  • Ø Regele, M. D., & Neck, H. M. (2012). The entrepreneurship education  subecosystem in the United State: Opportunities to increase entrepreneurial activity. Journal of business & entrepreneurship, 23(2).
  • Ø Report on Monitoring and Improving the Entrepreneurship System of Iran. (2017). Recognition existing status based on indicators (GEI). Retrieved from Tehran:
  • Ø Robbins, s. P., & Decenzo, d. A. (2015). Fundamentals of management (A. S. Mohammad & H. S. Mohammadali, Trans. 10 ed.). Tehran: Office of Cultural Studies.
  • Ø Simmons, A. S., & Hornsby, S. J. (2014). Academic entrepreneurship: Creating an entrepreurial ecosystem. In. Howard House, Wagon Lane: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Ø Tarabishy, A., Fernald Jr, L. W., & Solomon, G. T. (2003). Understanding entrepreneurial leadership in today’s dynamic markets. Small Business Advancement.
  • Ø The Word Bank. (2017). Ease of Doing Business Rank. Retrieved from
  • Ø Thornberry, N. (2006). Lead like an entrepreneur: McGraw Hill Professional.
  • Ø Van Auken, H., Fry, F. L., & Stephens, P. (2006). The influence of role models on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(02), 157-167.
  • Ø Wells, C., & Feun, L. (2007). Implementation of learning community principles: A study of six high schools. Nassp Bulletin, 91(2), 141-160.