نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دکتری مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی
2 دانشیار مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی
3 دانشیار سنجش و اندازه‌گیری دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی
چکیده
هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی راهبردها و پیامدهای سلامت اداری در صنعت فوتبال ایران بود.
روش‌شناسی: این پژوهش از نوع پژوهش‌های اکتشافی و دارای ماهیّت کیفی بود که به صورت پی در پی انجام پذیرفت. گردآوری داده‌ها با استفاده از مطالعه اسناد و مصاحبه با 17نفر ازصاحب‌نظران (با یکی از نمونه‌ها دو بار مصاحبه شد) حوزه فوتبال به صورت مصاحبه عمیق و نیمه‌ساختارمند بود که با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و با تکنیک گلوله برفی انتخاب و تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری ادامه یافت. سپس داده‌های حاصل از مصاحبه‌ها به روش تئوری زمینه‌یابی (گرندد تئوری) در سه مرحله کدگذاری‌های باز، محوری و گزینشی تجزیه و تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌ها بیانگر وجود 54 گویه مؤثر در بحث راهبردها بود که در یازده مقوله فرعی (مؤلفه)؛ آموزش تخصصی و عمومی، تدوین قوانین ارتقاء، ایجاد نظارت و ارزیابی، برخورد قضائی با تخلّفات، اصول مدیریتی و فردی، ایجاد ساختار، کاهش انحصارطلبی، تصمیم‌گیری مشارکتی و برنامه محوری بود که در پنج مقولۀ اصلی دسته‌بندی شدند. همچنین در بحث پیامدها نیز در دو مقولۀ فرعی جنبه فوتبالی و جنبه اجتماعی در مقولۀ اصلی توسعه و پیشرفت فوتبال طبقه‌بندی شدند.
نتیجه‌گیری: به طور کلی بر اساس یافته‌های این پژوهش، راهبردها و پیامدهای ارائه شده می‌تواند به مسئولین حاکمیّتی در راستای بهبود سلامت اداری و مقابله با بروز فساد و در نتیجه توسعه و بالندگی صنعت فوتبال کمک شایانی نماید.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Determine Strategies and Consequences of Administrative Iintegrity in Football Industry of Iran
نویسندگان [English]
- Ahmad Mahmoudi 1
- Habib i Honar 2
- Jalil Younesi 3
- javad Shahlaee Bagheri 2
1 Ph.D. in Sport Management Allameh Tabataba’i University
2 Associate Professor of Sports Management Allameh Tabataba'i University
3 Associate Professor of Assessment and Measurement Allameh Tabataba'i University
چکیده [English]
Objective: The aim of present study is to determine strategies and consequences of administrative integrity in football industry of Iran.
Methodology: The study is an exploration research and is considered as qualitative conducted sequentially. The data gathered through documents and interview for 17 scholars-one of them interviewed twice- about football in deep-interview and semi-structured forms. The sample selected through subjective sampling and snowball approach and interviewing continued to get theoretical saturation. Then, data analyzed by grounded theory in coding process included three steps: open, axial and selective coding.
Results: The result revealed that there were 54 effective factors in strategies consisted of 11 components: specialized and public instruction, compile improvement principals, supervise, control and evaluate, judicial decisions for offending, management and personal principals, formulate structures, reduce monopolization, coordinative decision and program-orientation in five main entries. Also, consequences categorized into two subcategories of football and main category of football development and improvement in social aspect.
Conclusion: Generally, according to findings, proposed strategies and consequences could be claimed that help government officials to improve administrative integrity and counter to corruption and get development and improvement in football industry.
- Abzari,M. Faghani,F. (2013). Application of AHP and TOPSIS Approach to Prioritize the Factors Affecting Corruption and its Coping Strategies. Issue 1, Volume 10 (36) .57-43.[Persian]
- Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management review, 33(3), 670-684.
- Bjørnskov, C. (2003). Corruption and social capital. Aarhus School of Business.
- Brooks, G., Lee, J., & Kim, H. (2012). Match-Fixing in Korean Football. International Journal of Contents, 8(2), 82-88.
- Brown, M. T. (2005). Corporate integrity: Rethinking organizational ethics and leadership. Cambridge University Press.PP:1-42.
- Buraimo, B., Migali, G., & Simmons, R. (2012). Corruption does not pay: An analysis of consumer response to Italy’s Calciopoli scandal. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Campbell, J. L., & Göritz, A. S. (2014). Culture corrupts! A qualitative study of organizational culture in corrupt organizations. Journal of business ethics, 120(3), 291-311.
- Di Ronco, A., & Lavorgna, A. (2015). Fair play? Not so much: Corruption in the Italian football. Trends in Organized Crime, 18(3), 176-195.
- Elahi, A. Sajjadi, S N. Khabiri, M. Abrishami, H. (2009). Barriers to the Development of Income-Based Income Recovery in the Islamic Football Association of Iran. Journal of Sport Management, No. 1, pp. 202-189. [Persian]
10. Gee, J., Button, M., & Brooks, G. (2011). Fraud in football: research into how football protects itself against fraud. University of Portsmouth, England, P: 1-21.
11. Ghiyrian, H. (2012). The role of mass media in controlling corruption. Journal of Research in Media Studies. Volume 7, Issue 2 (17), Pages: 148-141. [Persian]
12. Gholipour, R. Nick Raftar, T. (2006). Corruption and appropriate strategies to combat it. Journal of Parliament and Strategy. No. 53 pp. 54-33. [Persian]
13. Goodarzi, M. Ghorbani, M H. Poursalatani Zandi, H. Safari, H R. (2011). The study of factors affecting the growth of perceived corruption and its control solutions for sports organizations in Iran. Research in sports science. No. 10 pp. 56-39. [Persian]
14. Gorse, S., & Chadwick, S. (2011). The prevalence of corruption in international sport: A statistical analysis. Report prepared for the Remote Gambling Association and their Partners, The European Gaming and Betting Association and the European Sports Security Association. Page: 1-41.
15. Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. Sage. PP: 5-54.
16. Gross, M. (2011). Organizations of corrupt individuals: a study of corruption in international cricket and the Catholic Church. University of Wollongong thesis collection. PP: 1-325.
17. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.
18. Hakhverdian, A., & Mayne, Q. (2012). Institutional trust, education, and corruption: a micro-macro interactive approach. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 739-750.
19. Hasani, A. Shams, A. (2012). Anti-Corruption Strategies Based on Islamic Values. Journal of Islamic and management research. Issue me, 104-81. [Persian]
20. Jones, K. L. (2012). Match-Fixing in Sport: A Mapping of Criminal Law Provisions in EU 27 (March 2012). The International Sports Law Journal, (1-2), 135.
21. Lederman, D., Loayza, N. V., & Soares, R. R. (2005). Accountability and corruption: Political institutions matter. Economics & Politics, 17(1), 1-35.
22. Masters, A. (2015). Corruption in sport: From the playing field to the field of policy. Policy and Society, 34(2), 111-123.
23. McKelvey, S., & Moorman, A. M. (2007). Bush-Whacked: A Legal Analysis of the Unauthorized Use of Sport Organizations’ Intellectual Property in Political Campaign Advertising. Journal of Sport Management, 21(1), 79-102.
24. Moyo, S. (2014). Corruption in Zimbabwe: an examination of the roles of the state and civil society in combating corruption (Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Lancashire).P:60-61.
25. Olken, B. A. (2007). Monitoring corruption: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of political Economy, 115(2), 200-249.
26. Pathak, R. D., Singh, G., Belwal, R., & Smith, R. F. I. (2007). E-governance and Corruption-developments and Issues in Ethiopia. Public Organization Review, 7(3), 195-208.
27. Pillay, S. (2004). Corruption–the challenge to good governance: a South African perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(7), 586-605.
28. Reinikka, R., & Collier, P. (Eds.). (2001). Uganda's recovery: the role of farms, firms, and government. World Bank Publications.PP:1-91.
29. Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge university press.
30. Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage Publications.PP:1-22.
31. Seligson, M. A. (2006). The measurement and impact of corruption victimization: Survey evidence from Latin America. World Development, 34(2), 381-404.
32. Stachowicz-Stanusch, A. (2010). Corruption immunity based on positive organizational scholarship towards theoretical framework. Organizational immunity to corruption: Building theoretical and research foundations, 1-479.
33. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J (1998), Basics of qualitative research: Ground theory procedures and techniques, new bury Park, CA: Sage.
)