Rasool Nazari; saeid tabesh
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was The Challenge of Iran's Sport development with Non Systematic Talent idification approach and elite Approach. Methodology: The reasech method was mixed type and actually is a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. The population in the qualitative phase ...
Read More
Objective: The aim of this study was The Challenge of Iran's Sport development with Non Systematic Talent idification approach and elite Approach. Methodology: The reasech method was mixed type and actually is a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. The population in the qualitative phase includes 20 of managers, coaches and university professors who are active or acted in the get talent and elitism of sport. The quantitative section of the reasech is analytical type. In this part we rank the identified ghallenge. Given that the number of population was not statistically significant, so the maximum sample in the quantitative section 384 experts and sports trainers were selected randomly. Instruments included a six-part questionnaire objectives, structure, leadership, communications, compensation and aid mechanisms that were obtained from the qualitative analysis. These questions are classified in six sections of aims, structures, leadership, communications, compensation and aid mechanisms. Face and content validity of the questionnaire was approved by ten sports management and its reliability was calculated through Cronbach's alpha (α=0.79). After collecting the questionnaires, data are analyzed in two descriptive and inferential sectionsIncluding fridmantest by use of spss22 software. Results: The results showed that the most important challenges of the greenhouse model you will find talent and elite sport in Iran include: communication, leadership, compensation, assistance mechanisms, structure and objectives in order of priority groups.The highest mean of the communication aspect was with a mean of 4.55 and the lowest mean of the target dimension with an average of 3.82. Conclusion: Generally, it can be acknowledged nonsystematic approaches do not show the nature and reality of sport and capitalize on limited subjects, sports performance and sinusoidal vibration mode are experiencing.
raziyeh ashoori; Hamid Reza Goharostami; manigheh sadeghi
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of the present research was Analysis of the Effect of Quality Dimensions on the Satisfaction of the Participants in Iran's Volleyball Talent Development System. Methodology: The present study is of applied research type and in order to gather the data, a descriptive survey ...
Read More
Objective: The purpose of the present research was Analysis of the Effect of Quality Dimensions on the Satisfaction of the Participants in Iran's Volleyball Talent Development System. Methodology: The present study is of applied research type and in order to gather the data, a descriptive survey method was used. The sample size was 105 people including the scouts and the ones in charge of scouting who participated in the second national under-12 junior mini-volleyball championship and also the officials of the Iran Volleyball Federation. The instrument of the study was Ulrike Röger and Alfred Rütten’s questionnaire of talent development systems quality (2010), that was localized and it should be noted that the variable "satisfaction with international performance” is a constructed one. In case of the instrument validity, its content validity was confirmed by the experts of the field and the construct validity was also calculated through PLS3 software, using the structural equations model. The reliability of the model was calculated 0.84 using Cronbach’s alpha test. In order to analyze the data, descriptive and inferential statistics (mean and standard deviation, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Friedman’s rank test,U Mann–Whitney test and structural equations modelling by PLS3 software)were used.Results: The results of the explanation of the relationship between the quality dimensions of the system of development of talent showed that the relationship between structure variables on the process (T-value=7.3), process on results (T-value=76.73), results on satisfaction (T-value=73.23) has been meaningful. While the relationship between the structure variable on satisfaction (T-value = 1.70) and process on satisfaction (T-value = 0.85) is not meaningful.Conclusion: Ultimately, the quality model of volleyball development system is a pathway in which the structure, process and results are systematically managed and lead to satisfaction of the stakeholders.
