Social Issues in Sport Management
Fateme Ghane; Hamidreza Goharrostami; Mostafa MolaeiNejad
Abstract
Objective: The goal of the research was to determine the perceived social impacts of championship sports and the degree of relationship with the desire to support.Methodology: The research method was descriptive correlational. The statistical population was students of universities in Rasht, of which ...
Read More
Objective: The goal of the research was to determine the perceived social impacts of championship sports and the degree of relationship with the desire to support.Methodology: The research method was descriptive correlational. The statistical population was students of universities in Rasht, of which 456 students were selected as a sample based on the Morgan table using a stratified random method. The data collection tool was standard questionnaires. The face and content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by sports management professors and reliability was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha (ɑ=0.87). Friedman test and logistic regression were used to analyze the data using SPSS20 software.Results: According to the results of the Friedman test, the highest perceived social impact was related to international credibility and political power with an average rank of (7.21) and the lowest was related to the ability and quality of life of athletes with an average rank of (2.52). Also, the results of logistic regression showed that there is a significant relationship between the dimensions of perceived social impact (dimensions of good feeling and enthusiasm, sports participation and health) and support in the form of willingness to spend taxes paid in championship sports. Also, there was a significant relationship between the dimensions of perceived social impact (dimensions of equality and social inclusion, good feeling and enthusiasm and local consumption and living conditions) and support in the form of willingness to follow sports news and information; Similarly, there was a positive and significant relationship between the dimensions of perceived social impact (dimensions of equality and social inclusion, good feeling and enthusiasm, sports participation and health, local consumption and living conditions) and support in the form of willingness to watch sports competitions and events on television.Conclusion: Therefore, it is concluded that the dimensions of feeling good and enthusiasm, sports participation and health, equality and social inclusion, local consumption and living conditions, respectively, cause support for championship sports. Therefore, paying attention to these effects at different levels is a basis for paying attention to championship sports and government investment in championship sports based on the intended goals.
Fatemeh Rajabizadeh; Hamid Reza Goharrostami; Mostafa Molaei Nejad
Abstract
Objective: The study Stakeholder perception of the factors influencing the success of team sports in Guilan province.Methodology: Descriptive-survey research method being a field study was conducted. The statistical population of the study includes bosses, vice presidents, Secretaries and employees of ...
Read More
Objective: The study Stakeholder perception of the factors influencing the success of team sports in Guilan province.Methodology: Descriptive-survey research method being a field study was conducted. The statistical population of the study includes bosses, vice presidents, Secretaries and employees of Guilan province sport committees having representatives in the premier league and first division of the country along with all managers, coaches, and players of the respective teams Available and targeted sampling methods were selected (217 people). The validity of the researcher-made questionnaire was confirmed by experts and its reliability (0.89) was calculated.Results: The results showed There is a difference between internal factors (p=0.021) and external factors (p=0.041) in the success of team sports in the Premier League and first division of Guilan province in three groups: manager, coach and athlete. In the internal dimensions in the dimensions of the coach (p=0.006), the player (p=0.021) and the team (p=0.013) and in the external dimensions in the media dimension (p=0.047) in the success of team sports in the Premier League and first division of the province. Guilan There are differences in three groups: manager, coach, and athlete. The results showed that the internal factors of the players 'factor had a greater effect than the external factors of the fans' factor.Conclusion: Sports managers are advised to pay attention to the priority of factors in planning and to give more credit to the importance of the success factor of the fans on success.
